Top 5 des lunettes de réalité mixte médicale aux États-Unis, 2026

“Overall, if you’ve used the first-gen headset, you’ll be hard-pressed not to notice the difference here. If you haven’t, just know that this won’t feel as uncomfortably heavy on your head as other virtual reality headsets can.”

“I only got a small taste of Hololens 2 and I’m already chomping at the bit to see how it will fare in the real world. But at $3,500, the target audience is clearly limited for now.”

“"I think it's measured in years ... not decades," Sullivan said. But there are a lot of things between HoloLens and broad consumer adoption: Microsoft's unique optics engine, the cost of the materials, and—possibly most importantly—a design that makes sense in a work context...”

“Well, the headset itself features two times the field of the view compared to the original HoloLens. There’s also fully articulated Hand Tracking, as well as Windows Hello and Eye Tracking. The headset can even map your hands and create a 3D model in the real world.”

“I demoed Microsoft's software and also tried a few other apps. I sat down and tried opening web browsers, then played a game or two (yes, there are a couple). What really struck me was how windows could pop up and float on my desk, or in whatever formation I wanted.”

“Eye tracking hasn't been a big factor in VR and AR -- yet. But it will be. The first HoloLens didn't have eye tracking. The Magic Leap One does, and higher-end enterprise-targeted VR headsets like the HTC Vive Pro Eye and Varjo VR-1 are starting to include it.”

“Discussion — Hands-on: Magic Leap 2 Shows Clear Improvements, But HoloLens 2 Retains Some Advantages By Ben Lang (self.MVIS)”

“One of the major drawbacks of other similar devices, such as the Hololens 2, is the reduced field of view. This would make it feel like you see the augmented reality through a post-stamp-sized window, which the Magic Leap 2 has seemingly resolved by significantly increasing...”

“Magic Leap 2 boasts a cutting-edge display with significant improvements in resolution, field of view (FOV), and refresh rate. The device features a 50% wider FOV compared to its predecessor, resulting in a more immersive and realistic user experience.”